![]() ![]() Let me know if it helps and if you suggestion to improve the abstraction. I am using an Intel i7-7700K, AMD RX-580GPU and 16gb of ram. The things I am experiencing match up perfectly with this post from 6 years ago. The idea is to reduce the number of times that the objects and the objects are triggered by reducing the management of the parameters to one abstraction : Hi guys so recently Bitwig has been freezing up and I've been getting 100 cpu usage from the audio engine whenever I tried to play a project with more than a couple of tracks. It surely can be even more improved and it's surely not adapted to all approaches and needs but in this particular case it reduced by half the use of the CPU. This is one solution that should reduce the use of the CPU when a large number of parameter is used. And if there are a lot of these abstractions (corresponding to a large number of parameters), this can become pretty CPU intensive! Solution of the problem And if there are several abstractions, this will trigger the first part for all the abstraction at each DSP tick. So the "first part" of the abstraction ( -> ) will be triggered at each param message (that is receive at each DSP tick - every 64 samples). As I increase the number of parameters in the txt file, the CPU usage of my daw (Bitwig) goes nuts. BS4 now comes shipped with Native Apple Silicon support on mac, allowing both. This latest update introduces several new features, making BS4 more powerful than ever and music production that bit easier. This abstraction works for only one parameter but it receive all the parameters' messages and route the right value using the index given the first argument (and then it sends the value to the object or to a object if a symbol is given for the second argument). High CPU Usage on large parameter count (Bitwig/VST) 121 Closed seegwen opened this issue on 8 comments seegwen commented on High CPU Usage on large parameter count (Bitwig/VST). The latest version of the grid-based DAW, Bitwig Studio 4, is currently in development, with a beta version currently available for testing. quote'dombitwig'Quick one: deactivating tracks (and even hiding those then) as well as deactivating devices and vst plugins to save cpu will be included in 1.1 as an additional function to the current 'on/off' button of devices, which acts like a mute, as you know. So for each parameter you use an abstraction pretty similar to the param.get abstraction given with the examples: You can use an abstraction as this patch where the first argument defined the number of parameters: This way, you can more easily see if the patch will be CPU intensive or not. Analyse the patchįirst of all, one good practice is to use a module in Pd that fakes the parameters' changes at each DSP tick. Perhaps that should even be in the documentation, in a section "How to manage with large number of parameters?". ![]() I will send you a suggestion for your patch on your email but as it can be interesting other people I try to reply in a generic way here. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |